----- Original Message -----
From: <Rggilmorej@aol.com>
To: <irkeeper@gate.net>
Sent:
Subject: Re: questions from the attorneys
Kevin,
Because the project is changing the estuarine shore zone above the tidal zone from a vegetated or sand bank to a concrete bank it has potential to change the physics of rain and wave runoff from the upper intertidal and supratidal zone. This creates a change in water movement, flow dynamics and what ever the water may carry into the lagoon. There are additional activities that could be implemented which would mimic a natural vegetated sand or rocky shoreline that would allow aquatic biota to utilize this margin of the Indian River Lagoon. Native vegetation plantings, or coquina rock rip rap along the shore line would enhance this project from the standpoint of mitigating runoff from concrete. I believe the present project is missing an opportunity to not only protect the properties and road above the bluff, but also in reducing the potential impact of any activity on or above the bluff on the biota of the Indian River Lagoon.
The generic problem appears to be the time allowed to spend
the money on the project. There should
be an allowance for potential grave environmental impacts, particularly when
they are large enough to deleteriously impact the local economy in the long
run. If the western shore of the Indian River Lagoon between
My greatest concern would be the water and sediment flow dynamics from the
supratidal zone and how this will impact the intertidal zone below it.
The present engineering may be necessary, but it needs some ecologically
sensitive dressing which should be part of the original plan, particularly when
it will impact a national treasure, the Indian River Lagoon.
Grant
R. Grant Gilmore, Jr., Ph.D.,
Senior Scientist
Estuarine, Coastal and Ocean Science, Inc. (ECOS)
Tel.: 772/562-9156
email: rggilmorej@aol.com